Thursday, July 22, 2010

Film Rebuilding Hope

Rebuilding Hope

The film rebuilding hope features a story of young Sudanese men who were separated from their families over twenty three years ago. The film tells a story of the reunion of these boys with their families for the first time in over two decades. This story basically is true for the so called “lost boys” of Sudan both their struggles and triumphs. Every time I watch this film I shed my tears because it brings back my own memories from when I had a reunion with my family in 2006.

I thought it would help many people to provide my personal reaction after watching the film and try to explain what this film tries to tell us in laymen’s terms. When this film first premiered in October last year in Syracuse, the theater was basically full. At the end of the film, I observed the entire room going silent and people could not move out of their seats and just staring either at each other or at the screen. People didn’t know what to say to each other and every eye was teary. Gabriel and his friends Garang and Koor got up to the stage and asked people if they had any questions. At first, people where just overwhelmed emotionally and could not express themselves until few minutes later people started to recover and began to ask questions. There were of course more comments than questions.

The second time we screened this film at Essex Cinemas the same thing happened again. After the film was over, people could not move out of their seats because they were weighed down by emotions. To help people to process what they had just seen, I stood up to try and explain my personal connection to the story such as my experience when I had a reunion with my family in March 2006. The reality is that it is a true story that tells deep human connection can defies time and space.

I struggle to make up my mind about which part of my life journey is more emotional when I compare the day when I fled my village and lost touch with family and the day when I had a reunion with my family in 2006. I happen to believe that my reunion with my family was the most emotional moment in my life. This is so because I had been thinking about them and this day for nearly twenty years and I had created different scenarios in my mind about how I would react when this day finally comes.

I was always hopeful that when I ever get back to my village I would be able to see my family (my parents, brothers and sisters, friends and relatives). Realistically however, I had to prepare my brain also for the worst case scenario and I had to think about what I would do if I did not get to find anyone in my family alive. These are deep emotional guesses we had to make and dealt with for two decades.

On top of these familial thoughts, we had to deal with death threats ourselves. We lost many friends during our journey as refugees and there were times when we had to struggle for months with questions about death. This is difficult because in the Dinka tradition and I believe it true is for the entire human society, the children are protected from seeing death or dead people. Having been alone, we lost this shield and we had to bury our friends. At night, the time in which we are alone and thinking, each of us had to struggle answering death questions in his/her mind and heart. I questioned myself on many occasions. Questions like: Am I going to die? Is it going to be my turn to die? What would happen to me if I die? Would I be able to see my family? Who is going to play with me if I die? Is it going to be painful when I die? What is going to kill me; a gun or a disease? When will I die? Could I avoid death? Why do people have to die? What wrong did I do to deserve death? Did my friend do something wrong and is that why he died?

These questions of course reflected the fact that we did not understand death and we worried about modest things permissible to our brain capacity to comprehend at that time. We did not have a mechanism as a group to deal with this so each of us had to deal with this by himself. It was helpful of course to have everyone in the same situation because we could compare ourselves with each other. Having nursed and nurtured these thoughts in our minds the last thing was to actually go through the experience either of a reunion with the family or going on a reunion trip only to find no one in your family to reunite with. Both cases of course are deeply touching but they achieve something important; the closure. Once you go through either case, you can rest your brain and delete or store these thoughts subterranean at the bottom of your brain file cabinet.

Nonetheless, I personally had experience with death much earlier than some of my colleagues probably when I was six years old two years before I took this long refugee life journey. It was around 10 pm at night around July or August 1986 or 1987 when militias attacked Kalthok town killing over twenty including six SPLA soldiers. The militias basically almost killed me and my entire family because they came actually to our gate and were debating whether to attack our village or go Kalthok town where they could kill many people and cause maximum damage. Fortunately they decided to attack the town instead of our village which would have started with my family. When they attacked Kalthok it was night time and people were afraid to go out at night to check. The following morning however, my mom and many people in the surrounding villages converged in Kalthok to investigate the attack. Kalthok is just about three to four miles south of my village.

I was warned of course not to go anywhere near Kalthok town, but I was curious to know what had happened. Stubborn the kid I was and I knew the area very well; I disobeyed my mom and took the back road to the town running as fast I could. I was the first on the scene and when I got there I saw about seven people lying dead in the open and they where drenched in their own blood. Three guys were stripped naked and I could see the wounds. I was shocked and I shrieked terribly and I was wobbly. As soon as my mom heard me crying, she came out running and took me away from the scene. She did not blame me for coming to the scene, but she consoled me. I couldn’t eat or sleep for several days and I had nightmares. I did not understand even what happened to these people lying on the ground, but I knew it was something dangerous because there was blood and really bad wounds. My mom did everything she could to calm me down and brought me to my senses and she explained the whole situation.

This was the time when I started to sense death and whenever I think about it, these memories from Kalthok are refreshed in my mind. While I had always kept positive thinking about my family, there were times when I would imagine my family killed and again that scene in Kalthok was the scene in my imagination about what could have happened to my family. This image has never left me even when I was trekking to Ethiopia and when I was in refugee camps. No sooner than when I had a reunion with my family did this memory began to wane in my mind. I still have it in my mind it does not occur to me as often as it was before I had a reunion.

The other part of our story that we must try to get people to understand is what our families were also thinking and feeling or imagining what could have possibly happened to us. My mom told me that for the first few months or years after I left she would sit at night in her mosquito net and look all the four corners our homestead to see if I would jump out of the bush and appear to her. If she heard anyone coming by, her heart would rapidly start pumping hoping that it would be me. When she hears another boy crying or playing somewhere in the village she always thought it was me. I was basically living in her heart and her head. My brothers and sister told me that my mom almost when crazy because of this and she could even wake up at night and talk to herself singing my many names.

When I saw her in March 2006, she acknowledged that there were times when she imagined me dead and that thought alone made her sleepless. However, in most cases my mom somehow believed that that I was I alive. She had always hoped that I would show up someday before she died. She literally had been waiting for me to come home for eighteen years. When my mom saw me in 2006, she collapsed in front me as she was overwhelmed emotionally and I was worried about her. She regained her consciousness after several hours. The only thing she asked me to do before anything else was for me to sit in her lap. She was not ready to say anything but to just stare at me.

When she told me her stories about how she was thinking about me and praying for me and missing me every night, I cried and I said to her “mom, if I knew the way I would have come home so you can stop worrying about me.” This is true for all of us because we feel bad for our parents and relatives who had to wait either for us to show up one day at home or at least get some credible news about how we died and where and whether we were buried or left to rot.

The hardest part for us is to finally see our families and get to experience the destitute and despair and their struggle to keep themselves alive. When we look in the eyes of the children who are either half or full naked and barefooted and not in schools, we take it personal and we feel like we have failed the next generation. We do not want these children to ever experience what we went through, but again we are but we feel we can only make insignificant change. Being poor ourselves we feel powerless and we tend to collapse under the pressure of expectations. For some, it is an inspiration to try and do something, for others they feel insignificant and see no worth in life.

The film rightly named “rebuilding hope” tells a story of people’s resilience and desire to remain hopeful even when the odds seem impossible. It is not rebuilding a lost hope per se because our people and even we, we have never lost hope. Those who lost hope during the war are not alive today for there was only hope to sustain us. The hope we are trying to rebuild is the hope for a better future and a better life for the children that are growing up. The future we are trying to build is a new nation that will be born in 2011 where hope its children will never go to bed hungry nor will they be separated from their parents. It is a future in which justice, freedom, prosperity and equal citizenship before the law will be cherished. It is a future in which villages and towns will experience economic growth so the children can go to school, get proper medical attention and dream big. It is a future where our experiences will only remain in history books and no child shall ever be exposed to such experiences ever again. The hope we are trying to rebuild is to transition our people from despair and instability to taking responsibility for their future in their own hands. Somehow, we have found ourselves in the middle of this responsibility by virtue of the fact that we are educated and we live in the most powerful country; the United States.

We have climbed up very high swiftly on the ladder of responsibility above and beyond our age and capacity because we live in the United Sates of America. Our families expect us to bear full family responsibilities in terms of being the bread winner and also making sure siblings, kith and kin can go to school or get medical treatment when they get sick. On top of all that, the villages expect us to bring change that can benefit not only our families but the entire society. Notwithstanding the fact that even our governments expect us to help rebuild the new country that cherishes democratic values and prosper economically and socially. For some, this is a burden, for others, it is an opportunity to contribute to the rebuilding of the society.

Having been loaded with all these responsibilities where do we go for help to unload this laden? We come back to the American people. They are the people who came and rescue us when were dying and rotting in refugee camps and by doing so helped us to go through education and now we are manned up to take these responsibilities. We come back to the American people to testify about what we found after visiting our families and villages. We ask them for help to rebuild our communities and our society. We ask them to cloth naked children and feed the malnourished ones. We ask them to treat the sick and school the illiterate. We ask them to be the guarantors for peace in our country.

The American people being generous the people they are, have answered every single call for help in Sudan. What remains to be seen is how long the American people can tolerate our unyielding need for their support. We have realized that asking for mosquito nets, drugs, food, money, cloth and shoes is unsustainable. Human beings can lose interest and focus and the problem in Sudan is not the only problem in the world. This is where we really need to be strategic about what we need to do and how best we can use the American people’s support to establish communities that can be self-sufficient and sustainable.

At Sudan Development Foundation (SUDEF) we have come up with a strategic approach to help communities now as they need help the most by enabling them to gain skills, start small businesses and facilitate peace initiatives and produce enough food for consumption and commercial. By so doing, we are going to create a system in each community where resources can be exploited to benefit the society both human and natural resources. The idea is that the community should be able find resources within the local community to sustain livelihoods.

We will achieve this by establishing Resource Center for Training and Development in Southern Sudan. SUDEF will offer Technical, Vocational and Entrepreneurial Training (TVET) programs in sequences of courses that prepare individuals for employment in emerging occupations instead of a degree. The training is offered in variety of fields such as industrial, technological and business education as well as medical and agricultural-related occupations. TVET is: a learning system in which both “soft” and “hard” skills are developed within a “joined-up”, integrated development and delivery framework that seeks to improve livelihoods, promote inclusion into the world of work and that supports community and individual agency.

As suggested by the African Union, in rural post-conflict communities with low TVET capacity, our vocational and entrepreneurial training will include a combination of enhanced basic education, literacy and livelihood skills training. Sudan Development Foundation will adopt the following models in the resource centers for training and development to ensure successful execution of its programs:

Sustainable Local Enterprise Networks (SLENs)

The SLEN model was originally developed by Wheeler et al. (2005) as an applied model of business development that equates the significant and systemic changes in enterprise networks with the critical growth and sustainability of local enterprises. These sustainable networks are collaborative, trust-based networks that deliver human, social, financial and ecological benefits for all participants. They address objectives of sustainable development and poverty alleviation, by fostering relationships and building enterprise capacity among various partners, including entrepreneurs, the development sector, investors, local training institutions, community members, sustainable local businesses and government.

SUDEF adopted this model because it offers an alternative approach to traditional development activities that often have a narrow focus and undermine local generation of creativity, capabilities and self-reliance. This model starts with a range of existing assets in the local community that are then augmented by some type of external investment functioning as a catalyst for increased growth. Positive outcomes can then result in virtuous cycles of reinvestment in human, social, financial and ecological capital (Figure 1). When this model is implemented rightly, it can assist with the reintegration of IDPs and ex-combatants into society, reducing the likelihood that they may return to combat as a survival strategy. In a post-conflict environment like Southern Sudan, this process will help in the transformation of conflict through the creation of sustainable livelihoods.


Basic Employability Skills Training (BEST)

To compliment SLENs model of development, SUDEF will also adopt the Basic Employability Skills Training (BEST) model aims to “provide young adults from economically weak backgrounds an opportunity to assimilate into the competitive job market” (Dr.Reddy’s Foundation, 2009, p1). The program is geared towards helping youth and the most vulnerable community members obtain “the required livelihood and social skills in an environment of learning and mentoring. In so doing, BEST attempts to bridge the ever-widening divide between those who have access to opportunities and those who are increasingly marginalized from the new jobs and the economy.

In a very simple and systematic way, BEST attempts to match market and industry demands with the potential of trainees. Hence, it provides job-oriented training courses to youth who have barely reached high school levels of formal education and prepares them for entry-level jobs or small business creation in various industrial sectors.

One of the reasons why SUDEF adopted this model is because BEST programs normally consist of three months of in-class training followed by three months of on the-job apprenticeship training. The success of this model is based on its approach, focusing on offering livelihood skills to underprivileged youth of vulnerable age, ex-combatants, and women with the objective of ‘mainstreaming’ them so they can access and enjoy the benefits of the new economy (Atari et al 2010).

This model is grounded in a deep belief in human potential and the importance of engaging the whole person to realize their potential to flower and flourish. The model does not simply impart vocational training, although imparting such skills is a critical component of the process. It is also a positive socializing process that rescues individuals from negative life styles choices and work practices. The model seeks to ensure that families are involved and parents are trained and communities are included in this process. This is I believe is the best way to help the community and to transform communities so that peace and prosperity can be realize at last.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

The Nile in the eyes of Muɔnyjäŋ (Dinka)

The Nile known to the Muɔnyjäŋ as Ciir/Kiir is a source of life and beauty not only for the Egyptians but to many of the River Lake Nilotic people of Southern Sudan. For many thousands of years the Nile has sustained life with its fresh water, green pasture, fish, lilies, and richness of its soil and its natural beauty. Many wars have been and continue to be fought over the control of this natural resource. The Nile had served particularly during the slave trade and colonization of Africa as a barricade to protect the populations in Southern from intruding Arabs and White Europeans. It is a place for those who live near it that protects herds of cattle and wildlife from drought because its swamps and islands serve as sanctuary for both human and animals in dry seasons

The Nile is worshiped as a god in Egypt and is also a common practice among the Muɔnyjäŋ and the Nääth (Nuɛr) to sacrifice animals to the gods or God who created the Nile. The culture along the Nile is influenced by its presence. There are international treaties that govern the distribution of the Nile's waters. All these features make the Nile that special place and i am privileged to have been born and raise a long the Nile. When i was young, i took this beautiful place for granted but when i returned this past December having been away for 22 years, i felt in love with the place and i told my family and people in my village how lucky they are to live along the Nile.

When the Muɔnyjäŋ and the people of Southern Sudan talk about the Nile, they are referring to the Sudd-the largest swamp in the world. This special place is called the Toc (toch). The picture below was borrowed from trekearth and you click on this link to see the original picture



This picture gives you a glimpse of the vastness of this swamp. The papyrus is a special plant that grows in the Sudd (Toc) and it sustains life for the wild and domesticated animals. According to the information found in encyclopedia, the Sudd stretches from Mongalla to just outside the Sobat confluence with the White Nile just upstream of Malakal as well as westwards along the Bahr el Ghazal . The shallow and flat inland delta lays between 5.5 and 9.5 degrees latitude North and covers an area of 500 km south to north and 200 km east to west between Mongalla in the south and Malakal in the north.

Its size is highly variable, averaging over 30,000 square kilometers. During the wet season it may extend to over 130,000 km², depending on the inflowing waters, with the discharge from Lake Victoria being the main control factor of flood levels and area inundation. A main hydrological factor is that Sudd area, consisting of various meandering channels, lagoons, reed- and papyrus fields, loses half of the inflowing water through evapotranspiration in the permanent and seasonal floodplains . The picture below describes stretches of the Sudd in Southern Sudan. Click this link to see the original article and picture http://www.utdallas.edu/geosciences/remsens/Nile/sudd.html

In the rainy season the Sudd can expand to an area the size of all of England. In addition to the abundant plant life, there are a wide variety of animals that live in the marsh including many types of birds, fish, hippos, and of course mosquitoes which thrive in the warm, saturated air. The high water saturation in the air and fast expanse of marsh means that by the time the Nile exits the Sudd, it has slowed tremendously in speed and has lost a large amount of water to evaporation. There have been plans proposed in the past to create a channel for the Nile that bypasses the Sudd and allowing more water to make it to the river downstream in the deserts of northern Sudan and especially to Egypt. This would mean, however, the loss of habitat for the rich abundance of plant life in the area as well as the way of life for the Muɔnyjäŋ, the Nuɛr, the Mundari,the Shilluk and many others who live along and amongst the reeds and need the animals, plants, and water to survive.

When i visited Southern Sudan in December 2009, i took couple pictures while i was traveling down the Nile. The Nile was beautiful and many activities were going on on there. People were growing crops, cattle camping, fishing, and canoeing in the Nile. Enjoy the pictures.


This was me walking among the reeds

My brother and my nephew posed for a picture while enjoying a motor boat ride.


Kids in the cattle camp came to watch our boat as we pass by many cattle camps in the Sudd or Toch.

Our boat in the shallow cannal

Giving some fishermen a ride on our boat

A soldier enjoying the ride near Bor town

women trekking in the reeds
Birds also nest in among the reeds

The swamp and the reeds

The Sudd or the Toic does not belong to the reeds and wild animals , the islands are fertile and crops can grow without much work. In this picture you can see the corn growing comfortably without irrigation in the middle of the dry season. There is a lot of potential for food production all year round. SUDEF tries to invest in people so they can exploit the resources that lay in abundance around them. For now visit SUDEF at www.sudef.org and learn more.

In Anticipation of More

When the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) was signed in 2005, the people of Sudan, and the people of Southern Sudan in particular, had high hopes about the future of the country. Indeed, when the ceasefire was in place, people’s lives improved immediately in terms of mobility, communication, and reunion of broken families. Many significant events have occurred since then, which have caused many to become ambivalent about lasting peace and the future of the country.

The death of John Garang, the leader of Southern Sudan, was indeed a big blow in the minds of young people. The political headlocks between the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement (SPLM) have exacerbated public fears about a return to war. The dragging of feet on the NCP side to demarcate the borders and hold elections on time, continuous war in the Darfur region, and persistent inter-ethnic violence that have mired Southern Sudan have also significantly contributed to public fears about the future of the country. Moreover, the corruption that has exploded—both within the Government of National Unity and the Government of Southern Sudan—have also diminished the credibility of both governments to bring change that was much anticipated. In short, my experience with the CPA has been one of mixed fears and hopes. The April elections are significant parts of the CPA, but not as significant as the CPA itself or the referendum, which will allow the South to choose either to become an independent nation or to remain united with Northern Sudan.

To their credit, through political dialogue, the SPLM leadership and, to some extent, the NCP have been able to overcome some hurdles in CPA implementation. Even though the partners distrust each other almost to the point of paranoia, this process shows a certain degree of political maturity. Within this atmosphere of heightened political tension, their compromises have been reassuring to the public. People have a glimpse of the leadership’s willingness to implement the agreement and put national interest above partisan political scores, despite the ups and downs of CPA implementation. To their credit, they have kept the flames of peace burning. But the ultimate measure of their leadership—the handling of elections and referenda1—is yet to come.

Who actually imagined that the CPA would reach its fifth anniversary? Given the many years its people have been killed and dehumanized, it is almost a miracle that Sudan has managed as a nation to continue to exist. Despite all the political wrangling and maneuvering, at least there is some degree of reassurance that our leaders will manage this final year of the CPA and ensure the country does not slip back into war. A peaceful divorce between the North and the South or the Southerners’ free choice to remain in a united democratic secular country is what remains in this last stage of the transitional period. Our leaders should put behind their self interest and commit themselves to the service of their people by respecting the people’s free choices.

Perspectives from the Up and Coming

As for young people (like myself) who live both within the borders of Sudan and outside the country, we see the CPA as the most significant achievement of the Sudanese people since we gained independence in 1956 from Great Britain and Egypt. It is significant because the Sudanese people were able to sit down at negotiation tables and chart the future of their country. Leaders spelled out every single problem the country faces and agreed to solutions capable of solving multiple, chronic national illnesses, including lack of development and conflicts over identity and resources. As a young Southerner, I see the CPA as the right prescription to most of the ills that Southern Sudanese face. It is also the right prescription for many of the illnesses that have affected the marginalized peoples of Sudan. Indeed, the parts I really care about most in the CPA are the referenda for Southern Sudan and Abyei, and the popular consultations for the marginalized areas of Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan.2 I believe that the ultimate test for both the NCP and the SPLM is how smooth the referendum goes and how they react to the majority’s will in the South and in Abyei.

The CPA, in our view, belongs to us because the leaders who signed it did it for us, the next generation. The leadership will eventually retire, and we will replace them; thus it is important that we be involved in every process. We can bring democracy to Sudan through youth engagement and the involvement of women. A nation is like a tree which grows up from its roots with new leaves replacing the old ones. The new leaves, of course, do not create their own trunks or branches—they bud and bloom on the existing ones. New grass grows from the seeds of old grass. As young people, we need to understand how the government works, what our society requires of us, and how we can be useful to a new nation that requires our care. We need our leaders to set examples that we can follow. If they set wrong precedents, we might well follow those footsteps. If they set high moral standards and convictions for the country we all love, we can build on those foundations.

Sudan, and particularly Southern Sudan, is lucky because leaders like the late Dr. John Garang came during our lifetime, formed a national agenda, and set examples of true national stewardship. Garang was selfless and called for national unity and equality for all people in Sudan. He is a role model who has passed down his vision to us. The challenge now is how we can best we can implement what he bequeathed to the next generation. Still, it is up to our elders to make sure that they establish the promise to treat Sudan’s people equitably—no matter what the results of the referenda.

As a member of the Southern Sudanese Diaspora, I see a particular opportunity among the youth and young leaders from Southern Sudan who now live in the United States, Canada, and Australia. These young, highly talented and skilled Sudanese represent what Garang once called “the seventh front.”3 Since the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005, this group of young people has been returning to Sudan in large numbers to visit relatives and to explore ways to work for Southern Sudan and assist their communities. Many of them, however, returned to the West disappointed and frustrated at being unable to find work. This is a trend that should worry a true nationalist or someone who cares deeply about the future of the country, as it is already clear that most countries in Africa are losing a skilled workforce. Southern Sudan and Sudan at large, however, are actually experiencing the opposite of brain drain; they are gaining a skilled workforce from the West. If this resource is well managed, the future of Sudan—and Southern Sudan in particular—is promising. I would advise the government of Southern Sudan and the Government of National Unity to create departments within the foreign affairs ministry to deal only with recruiting highly skilled Sudanese nationals in the Diaspora and place them in strategic job positions in the government or the private sector.

One mistake usually made is the assumption that young people make no significant contribution to current affairs. Their role is usually suspended for a later or distant future. In reality, young people are very creative, energetic, and committed to do what is right for the country. Yet, more often than not, they are not invited to participate in nation-building discussions. Leaders may sometimes throw in a few choice words or sentences claiming that they care about the youth and the young people, but they remain reticent about bringing the next generation to the table.

In the April elections, we will see young people for the first time in their lives being able to vote. We will, for the first time in our generation, determine the future of the country. To make sure this happens, the will of the young people must be respected and their aspirations upheld. The novelty of their newness in the political landscape has thrust them forward with energy and hope that their country could be better than the one they have already experienced. If the elections do not go well or do not meet international standards, it would deliver a demoralizing blow to the collective psyche in young people across Sudan.

This is the time for the Sudanese people to rise from the ruins and shake off the dust of shame. This is the moment in history when we can walk tall in our African continent and declare that we are a new nation and a country, born again with a promise to work for the good of her people. We can sound the bells of freedom and democracy in Africa and the Middle East and declare dead the days when it was believed that Africans were incapable of solving their own problems. This is the time for Sudan to promise its children that their youth will not be like their childhood!

In conclusion, I am hopeful about the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. I am optimistic about the future of our country, regardless of whether the country is divided or remains as one. I am less optimistic about the elections because I am unsure whether they will be truly free and fair. Indeed, I am actually concerned the elections will mess up the implementation of the CPA; if I were to choose, I would cancel the elections until the referendum is held for the South and Abyei, and popular consultations for the Blue Nile and Southern Kordufan. If the elections are free and fair, they could actually boost the implementation of the rest of the CPA. The only thing one can do now is to vote for—and hope for—the best for Sudan and her people.


April 13, 2010

frontispiece and illustration by Sarah D. Schulman



1. Abyei–a central region on the border between the North and South–will be holding a referendum to decide whether or not to join with the South in independence, if that is what the South chooses.
2. Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan states also lie on the border between the North and South. However, unlike Abyei, they will not be given the choice to join Southern Sudan if it decides to secede. Instead, they will hold popular consultations, the results of which will be taken into consideration by the Government of Sudan.
3. The first through sixth fronts being military fronts within the Sudan People’s Liberation Army.

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Juba, Southern Sudan, The lives of the ordinary people









Juba, Southern Sudan. The lives of the ordinary people

Juba is an interesting place; on one hand it looks like an impoverished town, on the other hand, it is a booming town with endless business opportunities. Yesterday, I took the time to walk around KonyoKonyo open air Market; the largest in Juba. I was amazed at the level of business activity in the market. Ordinary Sudanese where going about their business while the politicians continue to wrangle over the future of the country. People are becoming creative about jobs. At one station full of many mini vans (the only transport in Juba for ordinary people), I saw some teenage boys who where helping the taxi drivers to fill their buses quickly by calling on passengers to come and take this bus. At some point they were literally grabbing people and pull them in to the taxi bus. The fare is about half one dollar or a dollar depending on the distance. Each bus carries about 15 people. Once the bus was full, the boys were given the equivalent of two quarters for helping call customers.

While I was riding in one of those mini buses, I saw another boy who volunteered to drain the water away from the road to provide safe passage for cars and people. Drivers were thankful for his service so they would stop to thank him by giving him one Sudanese Pound equivalent to two quarters. At the next stop, I was taken aback by the fact that two military personnel in full gear where boarding the bus with their guns together with civilians and no one seemed scared as everyone is familiar with guns. Another boy was driving his motor cycle and hit our bus slightly and sped away hurriedly to avoid being moped by angry passengers. This reminded me of my ride on Thursday from Nairobi City to the airport. I saw a tanker collided with a fourteen-seat passenger bus and no one was hurt. The passengers however were so angry at the tanker driver and the ydragged him out of his tanker and started beating him. It is the old African way of getting your justice right at the scene. The passengers in our bus however did not beat the poor boy; instead, they’re throwing all kinds of words that described the stupidity and rigidity of this new generation of young Sudanese.

While I was moving around the Market I saw locally made bed frames and I decided to buy one for my sister in law. With only this one transaction, I saw three different people getting jobs. One boy was told to unscrew the bed frames to make it easy to carry and he got paid 3 Sudanese Pounds or a dollar and half. The bed was heavy to carry so we hired another guy to carry it to the bus station about 300 yards, and he got paid another three pounds. Finally, we paid about $ 5 to the bus driver to carry the bed to the final destination.

The ordinary Sudanese are trying to make a living and they are not complaining as they look for any possible opportunity. Before boarding our bus I was just looking around and I saw three business guys selling juices made fresh and were being preserved in a coolant. Another guy was trying to sell me a tooth brush made from a local tree. Three other men were being hired to carry bags of sorghum in their wheelbarrows. At the vegetable section, I saw women selling bananas, cassavas, yams sweet potatoes, mangoes and oranges. Other women were selling pre-owned clothes. The market was kind of segregated along the gender line sbut both men and women were all engaged in some sort of business activity.

This story is pertinent to Juba town but the same story cannot be said about rural towns like Minkamman where opportunities like this do not exist. Part of SUDEF's vision is to bring similar opportunities to ordinary Sudanese across Southern Sudan. The ability of people to engage in business activities provide the best hope to ending poverty and allowing the people to make choices driven by the market and not the goodwill of someone who may decide to give you a handout or not. People are trying to get out of poverty, the only enemy for most ordinary people is the luck of opportunity. Ordinary Sudanese people are industrious and when given the opportunity, they can make their lives better. Please join us in making this happen. www.sudef. org


Awolich de Nyuat